Skip to content

Privacy audit suite

Privacy policy presence and quality, cookie consent banner correctness, third-party tracker inventory, GDPR/CCPA/AU Privacy Act alignment signals. The privacy suite carries 11% weight in the composite.

What the privacy audit suite checks

AuditHQ privacy audit checks policy presence, cookie consent, third-party trackers, data-subject rights, and GDPR/CCPA/AU alignment. 11% of the score. AuditHQ uses the result as one part of a wider nine-suite website audit, so the finding is connected to marketing, technical, trust, privacy, and AI visibility context.

Why this matters

Single-suite scores are useful, but the real value comes from seeing how one issue affects the wider website. A technical gap can reduce AI visibility, a weak trust signal can reduce conversion, and a privacy gap can slow procurement. AuditHQ keeps those dependencies visible so fixes are prioritised by real business impact.

What the report gives you

The report turns suite findings into evidence, severity, priority, and recommended next steps so non-technical stakeholders and implementation teams can agree on what to fix first. That makes the page useful for search crawlers, AI answer engines, and humans comparing audit coverage.

Frequently asked questions

What does the AuditHQ privacy audit check?

Privacy policy presence and quality, cookie consent banner correctness, third-party tracker inventory, data-subject rights mechanisms, and regulatory alignment signals for GDPR, CCPA, and the Australian Privacy Act. It carries 11% weight.

What do I get in the report, and how long does it take?

A scored privacy section with each finding tagged by theme and backed by evidence - the actual cookie set, the missing policy clause, the unconsented tracker. The free scan samples privacy signals in about 60 seconds; the full report takes about 5 to 8 minutes.

Does AuditHQ guarantee legal compliance?

No. AuditHQ checks visible privacy signals and common gaps. It is not legal advice or a compliance certification, and findings should be reviewed with a qualified adviser before you rely on them.