How much does a website audit cost?
Website audits range from free automated scans to five-figure consulting engagements. The honest answer is that price tracks who does the work and how much interpretation you get - here is the map.
Free automated tools: $0
Free scanners, Lighthouse, PageSpeed Insights, and the free tiers of audit platforms including AuditHQ's quick scan, surface genuinely real issues in minutes, and there's no good reason to skip this step regardless of what you do next. The catch is structural rather than a quality problem: each tool tends to cover one dimension, so a speed tool tells you about speed and nothing about whether your privacy policy is current or your email is authenticated, and the raw findings arrive without business context, a list of technical facts with no sense of which ones actually threaten revenue. You end up doing the synthesis yourself, deciding what a 40-point Lighthouse score for performance actually means for a business that gets most of its leads from mobile searches. As a starting point, free tools are genuinely useful and cost nothing to run. As a deliverable to hand a client or a boss, they fall short, because a screenshot of a tool's dashboard isn't the same as a prioritised explanation of what's wrong and why it matters.
Automated platforms: tens of dollars
Platform audits like AuditHQ sit in the gap between a free single-dimension scan and a human consultant, and the pricing reflects that: your first full multi-suite report is free with an account, then A$99 one-off, or from A$49 a month if you want ongoing monitoring rather than a single snapshot. What you're paying for at this tier is breadth and structure rather than a lower price on the same thing a freelancer sells. A platform runs technical, marketing, security, privacy, AI visibility, reputation and more in a single pass, then ranks what it finds by severity with evidence attached, rather than leaving you to guess whether a missing DMARC record matters more than a slow hero image. That structure is what makes the output usable as a client-ready document without a consultant's day rate attached to producing it. The trade-off is interpretation: a platform can tell you what's broken and how badly, but it can't have a conversation about your specific business context the way a person can.
Freelancer audits: hundreds
A freelance SEO consultant or developer typically charges somewhere from a few hundred dollars up to around a thousand for a manual audit, and that audit is usually scoped to one dimension, most often SEO or site performance rather than the full spread a platform or agency would cover. What you're actually buying varies enormously with the individual, more than at any other tier on this list, because a freelancer's output is entirely a function of their own experience and diligence. A good freelancer adds real interpretation a tool can't: they've seen dozens of similar businesses and can tell you which finding actually matters for yours, not just that it exists. A mediocre one runs the same free tools you could have run yourself, pastes the output into a branded document, and charges for the formatting. Before hiring, it's worth asking to see a sample audit, because the gap between the best and worst freelancers at this price point is wider than the gap between price tiers.
Agency audits: thousands
Agencies commonly quote from around one thousand dollars up to several thousand for a comprehensive audit covering multiple dimensions, and specialised engagements, formal accessibility compliance testing, security penetration testing, run well beyond that range because they require credentialed specialists and produce legally defensible documentation. What justifies the higher price isn't just more checks, it's senior judgement applied to your specific situation: an experienced auditor looks at findings in the context of your industry, your competitors and your growth stage, and turns a list of issues into a roadmap conversation about sequencing and trade-offs. That's genuinely valuable when a website is business-critical, when the fixes will require internal stakeholder buy-in, or when a specific certification or compliance sign-off is the actual deliverable rather than a side benefit. It's overkill when the underlying problem is a handful of straightforward technical fixes that a prioritised report would identify just as accurately for a fraction of the cost.
The real question: what happens after the audit?
An audit is only worth what actually gets fixed afterwards, which sounds obvious stated plainly but is routinely ignored in practice. A five-thousand-dollar agency report that gets read once, filed, and never actioned delivers less real value than a ninety-nine-dollar automated report that someone works through line by line over a fortnight, because the business outcome comes entirely from the fixing, not the finding. This is why the format of the output matters as much as its depth: whatever tier you choose, insist on findings ranked by actual impact rather than a flat list in the order a scanner happened to check them, and insist on concrete next steps rather than a description of the problem with no path to resolution. It's also worth budgeting time or money for the fixing work itself when you commission the audit, not after, because an audit with no implementation plan behind it is a diagnosis with no treatment, and diagnoses don't heal anything on their own.
A sensible sequence for most businesses
For most businesses, the sensible order is to start free and escalate only as the findings justify it. Run a free scan first to see roughly where the problems concentrate, technical, security, content, without spending anything. If those initial findings look substantial, meaning there's clearly more wrong than a single afternoon of DIY fixes would resolve, a platform-tier full report is worth the two figures it costs, because it gives you the complete prioritised list across every dimension rather than the one the free tool happened to check. From there, bring in a freelancer or agency specifically when you need hands to actually implement the fixes, not just find them, or when a specialised deep-dive, security testing, formal accessibility certification, is genuinely required and can't be substituted with a general audit. Escalating in that order means every dollar spent buys something the previous tier genuinely couldn't.
Frequently asked questions
Are free website audits any good?
Yes, within their scope. Free scans genuinely catch real issues and cost nothing to run, so there's no reason not to use one as a first pass on any site. Where they fall short is breadth and interpretation: most tools check a single dimension, speed or SEO basics, and none of them can tell you what matters most for your specific business, because they have no context on your industry, your customers or your goals. Treat a free audit as the start of a diagnosis, the thing that tells you roughly where to look next, rather than the complete picture. If the findings look substantial, that's the signal to move to a broader, prioritised report rather than trying to patch everything a free tool flagged in isolation.
What should a website audit include?
At minimum, it should cover technical health (speed, mobile behaviour, crawlability), search visibility, security signals, and basic conversion fundamentals like a clear call to action and visible contact details. Increasingly, it should also cover AI visibility, whether tools like ChatGPT and Perplexity can actually find and cite your site, since that's a growing source of traffic that traditional SEO audits don't touch. Privacy compliance and reputation signals round out a genuinely complete audit, because both affect how the business is perceived by regulators, procurement teams and everyday visitors doing a quick trust check before they commit. An audit missing any of these isn't wrong, just partial, and it's worth knowing which dimension you're not seeing.
How long does a website audit take?
It depends almost entirely on the tier. Automated platform audits run in minutes, AuditHQ's full nine-suite audit takes about 5 to 8 minutes end to end, because the checks run in parallel rather than being worked through by a person. Manual freelancer audits typically take a few days, since a person has to actually read the site, run their own tools and write up findings. Agency audits often take a week or more, particularly when they involve stakeholder interviews or a formal review process. Speed matters less than it seems, though: a same-day report that's just a raw tool export is less useful than a report a day later that's actually prioritised and tells you what to do first.